Tuesday, July 17, 2012

US FDA approves first Drug to prevent HIV

he Food and Drug Administration on Monday approved the first drug shown to reduce the risk of HIV infection, the latest milestone in the 30-year battle against the virus that causes AIDS.
The agency approved Gilead Sciences' pill Truvada as a preventive measure for healthy people who are at high risk of acquiring HIV through sexual activity, such as those who have HIV-infected partners. The decision comes less than two weeks after the agency approved another landmark product: the first over-the-counter HIV test that Americans can use in the privacy of their homes.
The two developments are seen as the biggest steps in years toward curbing the spread of HIV in the US, which has held steady at about 50,000 new infections per year for the last 15 years. An estimated 1.2 million Americans have HIV, which develops into AIDS unless treated with antiviral drugs. And it's estimated that one-fifth, or about 240,000 people, are unaware that they are infected.
US approves first pill to help prevent HIV
Associated Press
"I think the combination of self-testing and a medicine that you can take at home to prevent infection could mean a whole new approach to HIV prevention that is a bit more realistic," said Dr. Demetre Daskalakis of New York University's Langone Medical Center, who served on the FDA panel that recommended approving Truvada. While a positive step forward, Daskalakis added that Truvada would likely be unavailable for many people without health insurance, who often face the greatest risk of acquiring HIV.
Researchers had long sought to create a pill that could help stem the epidemic. Public health advocates said Monday that Truvada represents a major breakthrough, both as a medical therapy and as a means of expanding other preventive measures. Patients who get a prescription for Truvada will be expected to take part in a comprehensive HIV prevention plan, which experts say will enhance the drug's impact.
"It really marks a new era in HIV prevention because in adding Truvada as a prevention strategy, what comes with it is expanded access to HIV testing, condoms and preventive counseling and support," said James Loduca, vice president of the San Francisco AIDS Foundation.
But HIV experts have raised concerns that patients might not use the drug correctly. Dr. Tom Giordano of Baylor College of Medicine said Monday the drug must be taken every day to be effective, and would be most effective for a relatively small group of people.
"It's been most effective in people who are at very high risk and are able to take the drug on a regular basis," said Giordano, who served on the FDA panel that recommended approving the drug. "When you really boil it down that's going to be a relatively focused population, but it's an important population to treat."
The drug's label carries a warning that people should be tested to make sure they don't have HIV before starting Truvada. Patients who already have the virus could develop resistance to the drug, making their disease more difficult to treat. The label also warns of side effects, including kidney and liver problems.
Gilead Sciences Inc. has marketed Truvada since 2004 as a treatment for people who are already infected with the virus. The once-a-day pill is a combination of two older HIV drugs, Emtriva and Viread.
Starting in 2010, studies showed that the drug could prevent people from contracting HIV when used as a precautionary measure. A three-year study found that daily doses cut the risk of infection in healthy gay and bisexual men by 42 percent, when accompanied by condoms and counseling. Last year, another study found that Truvada reduced infection by 75 percent in heterosexual couples in which one partner was infected with HIV and the other was not.
Because Truvada is on the market to manage HIV, some doctors already prescribe it as a preventive measure. FDA approval will allow Gilead Sciences to formally market the drug for that use, which could dramatically increase prescriptions.
Truvada's groundbreaking preventive ability has exposed disagreements about managing the disease among those in the HIV community. Groups including the AIDS Healthcare Foundation asked the FDA to reject the new indication, saying it could give patients a false sense of security and reduce the use of condoms, the most reliable preventive measure against HIV.
But FDA scientists said Monday said there was no indication from clinical trials that Truvada users were more likely to engage in risky sexual behavior.
"What we found was that condom use increased over time and sexually transmitted infections either remained at baseline levels or decreased," said Dr. Debra Birnkrant, FDA's director of antiviral products. "So in essence, we don't have any strong evidence that condoms were not used or there was a decrease in condom use."
Gilead Sciences said Monday that it would keep the pill at its current price, nearly $14,000 per year. Even at that price, HIV physicians said the drug could be cost effective if it prevents people from contracting the virus.
"It is expensive, but on the other hand it's far cheaper than a lifetime of HIV treatment," said Dr. Joel Gallant of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. "So if there are people who will not use condoms but are willing to use this, then for those people it's cost effective."
The lifetime cost of treating one person diagnosed with the AIDS virus has been estimated at more than $600,000.
The decision by the FDA on Truvada follows its approval of the OraQuick test earlier this month. The test, which detects the presence of HIV in saliva collected using a mouth swab and returns a result within 40 minutes, is aimed at people who might not otherwise be tested. The FDA has said the test is not 100 percent accurate.

Monday, July 16, 2012

10 die per week in drug trials in India

New Delhi The government will be analysing mortality figures during drug trials in India following WHO data showing that 2,031 people died between 2008 and 2011 during such trials in the country. That comes to about 10 people per week, or more than one person a day.
At the same time, the data shows that only 1.5 per cent of clinical trials held across the world so far (2,770 of 1,76,641) have taken place in India — belying the perception of India emerging as the hub of such experiments.
“There are some diseases like cancer where mortality is high so a blanket statement about the number of deaths cannot convey anything. We have no figures to compare this (2,031 deaths in four years) with world statistics... So we are starting a project to get people to analyse these deaths, find out the causes, find out what effect the trial had on subjects and see from a scientist’s viewpoint,” said Secretary, Health Research, Dr V M Katoch.
The data showing that India has hosted only a minuscule amount of global clinical trials at least makes it clear that the country is not as big a centre as is being made out, he added.
Mortality rates in clinical trials in India have remained consistently high despite intermittent public outcry. While 438 deaths were reported in 2011, 668 died in 2010, 637 in 2009 and 228 in 2008, as per the World Health Organisation’s international clinical trial database.
Cautioning against jumping to any conclusions, Dr Katoch pointed out that data available with the clinical trial registry of India also shows that only 25 per cent of all trials in India are global trials. The others are for indigenous products. “It is not as if we are a banana republic that is putting our people at risk. We have a transparent system of registry and a comment about deaths is not valid without analysing the circumstances,” he said.
The component of globally driven trials being held in India is also on the decline. While before March last year, the trials held in India constituted 27.7 per cent of the internationally driven trials involving global drug developers and testers, this share is now down to 20 per cent.
Incidentally, an expert committee is already probing irregularities in functioning of the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) that grants approvals to hold clinical trials in India.
The committee was formed after the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health, in its last report, alleged a nexus among drug makers, CDSCO officials and experts who grant opinions on use of drugs. The panel had found that the CDSCO had approved 33 drugs (out of a randomly selected sample) for use in India without any country-specific clinical trials.
Experts believe government data on deaths during clinical drug trials in India is “underestimated”.
The Supreme Court has also expressed concern over safety of people being used as subjects in clinical trials of drugs, while the National Human Rights Commission too is reviewing the matter. It has sought detailed responses from the Central and state governments on regulations to approve clinical trials and to ensure safety of volunteers involved therein.

Source:Express news service


Supreme Court pulled up the Madhya Pradesh Govt for treating people as guinea pigs even as people are dying due to illegal clinical trials.

The Supreme Court on Monday(16-07-2012)  pulled up the Madhya Pradesh government on clinical  drug trials and came down heavily on the Shivraj Singh Chouhan administration for treating people as guinea pigs even as people are dying due to illegal trials. Terming it "most unfortunate', the apex court criticised the state government for the inadequate measures taken to curb the problem.
The Madhya Pradesh government, responding to the SC's censure, said that drug trial deaths were happening because of certain gaps in central laws.
Over 2,000 people have died in drug trials, according to the Drug Controller General of India.
CNN-IBN had accessed documents last year that showed that the Bhopal Memorial Hospital and Research Centre had been carrying out clinical trials on humans. The documents showed that at least 80 per cent of the patients on whom trials were conducted, were victims of the Bhopal gas tragedy.
What was suspected and had been alleged was confirmed. The multi-specialty hospital set up for gas victims conducted unethical drug trials on 279 patients of whom 215 were gas victims. The figures came from a letter written by the Hospital's director, Brigadier KK Maudar to the Deputy Drug Controller of India, Dr R Ramakrishna on February 22, 2011.
The Indian Council for Medical Research in its ethical guidelines for biomedical research on human participants has categorically said that adequate justification is required for involvement of those with reduced autonomy. In Bhopal, no such justification was offered. In fact, the hospital first denied that the drug trials were conducted on gas victims.
CNN-IBN had first reported about the unethical drug trials in June 2010 following which an enquiry was constituted. At that time, the hospital had denied conducting any of those trials on gas victims.
Source:-CNN-IBN news